m=0
Moderator: Clan Directors



























































3
2
2
2
rockfist wrote:I always thought that league favored specialists more than cup does, but maybe its not so skewed.
































































3
2
2
2
rockfist wrote:I donāt think so, I think itās pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange itās more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we donāt I usually get drafted (Iām above 55% away games).
Itās possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.





























rockfist wrote:I donāt think so, I think itās pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange itās more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we donāt I usually get drafted (Iām above 55% away games).
Itās possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.


































Nut Shot Scott wrote:rockfist wrote:I donāt think so, I think itās pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange itās more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we donāt I usually get drafted (Iām above 55% away games).
Itās possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.
My little system attempts to reward the all around player - away wins are very valuable and home losses sting - so if you play a balanced schedule and win, you'll be ranked high. If you only play home games as a map/settings specialist, you might win 75% of them but it will hurt you in the scoring due to the lack of variety. So I tried to kind of make it rather difficult for a specialist to be rewarded for specializing.







































IcePack wrote:Nut Shot Scott wrote:
My little system attempts to reward the all around player - away wins are very valuable and home losses sting - so if you play a balanced schedule and win, you'll be ranked high. If you only play home games as a map/settings specialist, you might win 75% of them but it will hurt you in the scoring due to the lack of variety. So I tried to kind of make it rather difficult for a specialist to be rewarded for specializing.
So are you hurt if you donāt take home maps and only do aways and do better then expected?





























loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....





























loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....



























MTIceman41 wrote:loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....
Nah it got evened out with some CCup battles in some years![]()
I remember one war against you guys you couldnāt buy a 2 on a dice roll...
Nut shot love what you are doing....
I would propose a coolness medal or a contribution medal for your hard work here...







































iAmCaffeine wrote:rockfist wrote:I donāt think so, I think itās pretty easy to send maps that you have specialists on for each one with 8 game sets so if you play away maps you face a specialist. In a 24,27, or 30 map exchange itās more difficult. I know for us if we have a specialist on a map they take it, but if we donāt I usually get drafted (Iām above 55% away games).
Itās possible that my experience is not what most people experience though.
how is it more difficult? you're still going to use 99% the same maps in the League as you do in a regular war so at least from a home map perspective, you'll play all the same specialist maps as usual minus 1 or 2 if you know don't favour your team over the opposing clan's on that particular map. same for away games, it's rare a clan doesn't have a team for every map these days.






























3
2
2
2
MTIceman41 wrote:loutil wrote:That CL 10 ranking must be wrong....
Nah it got evened out with some CCup battles in some years![]()
I remember one war against you guys you couldnāt buy a 2 on a dice roll...
























































4
2
JPlo64 wrote:CL11 had 9 clans. There were 9 rounds but each clan had a bye round and only played 8.
So Max 48 games.


















































niMic wrote:This is amazing.
I went from 22nd in CL10 to 130th in CL11. #Decline




































































niMic wrote:This is amazing.
I went from 22nd in CL10 to 130th in CL11. #Decline























































































3
2
2
2
Users browsing this forum: No registered users