m=0 Conquer Club • View topic - Three Kingdoms of China - v10.1 [2015-02-01] p15 [Quenched]
Conquer Club

Three Kingdoms of China - v10.1 [2015-02-01] p15 [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post a reply

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Seamus76 on Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:46 am

Gilligan wrote:
Seamus76 wrote:Has anyone been able to verify this xml? Sticky? Potential beta launch?


Still waiting for tnb. :(

Ok...i thought I saw him for a second, but that was just your avatar. ;) Just kidding, hope all is well with him.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby nolefan5311 on Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:40 am

Seamus76 wrote:
Gilligan wrote:
Seamus76 wrote:Has anyone been able to verify this xml? Sticky? Potential beta launch?


Still waiting for tnb. :(

Ok...i thought I saw him for a second, but that was just your avatar. ;) Just kidding, hope all is well with him.


Me too...he hasn't visited the site since last Friday, and hasn't posted at all since June 22.
User avatar
Captain nolefan5311
 
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Florida
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Seamus76 on Fri Jul 19, 2013 1:15 pm

Is there a plan for this? As far as I know it has been checked and is ready to go, but no sticky. Sorry, just impatient.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby squeaks_is_mine on Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:14 pm

Seamus76 wrote:Is there a plan for this? As far as I know it has been checked and is ready to go, but no sticky. Sorry, just impatient.
Ditto! Please bring on the beta ASAP!
User avatar
Cook squeaks_is_mine
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 4:39 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Bruceswar on Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:52 am

yawn... lets go! Beta!
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby isaiah40 on Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:28 am

Files have been sent! :D
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Seamus76 on Mon Jul 29, 2013 10:07 pm

isaiah40 wrote:Files have been sent! :D
Thanks. Just saw it's live!! Let the games begin.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby isaiah40 on Mon Jul 29, 2013 10:53 pm

Seamus76 wrote:
isaiah40 wrote:Files have been sent! :D
Thanks. Just saw it's live!! Let the games begin.

Well that was a mistake, it shouldn't have gone live yet.
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby isaiah40 on Mon Jul 29, 2013 10:56 pm

          Beta - Quenching

---The development period has concluded for the Three Kingdoms of China Map. All objections have had their time. The Foundry and I hereby brand this map with the Foundry Beta Brand. Let it be known that this map is now ready for BETA Play. After an extended period of time in BETA and once all quirks and issues have been resolved, the map will be put into Full Play (barring any Admins or Foundry Foreman vetoes).

Conquer Club, enjoy!

              Image


While the map is in BETA Play, there are a couple of administrative tasks that are required of the mapmaker(s) in addition to the initial gameplay testing:
    1. Please ensure that the first post of the thread contains all the necessary information to help future visitors to the development thread; it's particularly important to ensure the most recent images are there, along with any helpful guides (such as gameplay quirks/nuances or the location/size of any starting neutrals etc.)
    2. It is the responsibility of the mapmaker(s) to ensure that they respond to further feedback in a timely and constructive manner.
    3. Write a "creative" map description and send it to the Foundry Foreman via PM. You're encouraged to post it into the first post of the thread as well; the description will be used to populate the maps database.


isaiah40
Lieutenant isaiah40
 
Posts: 3990
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:14 pm
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby EricPhail on Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:01 pm

Okay I'll open the beta feedack with a quick question:

Cities bonus: The legend says +1 per 2 (implying +4 if you hold all of them)

however accoring to BOB: City Bonus (1) 3 City Bonus (2) 4 City Bonus (3) 5 City Bonus (4) 6 City Bonus (5) 7 City Bonus (6)
8 City Bonus (7) (that +1 for every city after the first)

Is BOB misreading this? If not: is the legend misleading, or the bonus coded wrong?
Sergeant 1st Class EricPhail
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:59 pm
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby -=- Tanarri -=- on Wed Jul 31, 2013 1:12 am

EricPhail wrote:Okay I'll open the beta feedack with a quick question:

Cities bonus: The legend says +1 per 2 (implying +4 if you hold all of them)

however accoring to BOB: City Bonus (1) 3 City Bonus (2) 4 City Bonus (3) 5 City Bonus (4) 6 City Bonus (5) 7 City Bonus (6)
8 City Bonus (7) (that +1 for every city after the first)

Is BOB misreading this? If not: is the legend misleading, or the bonus coded wrong?


Probably BOB misreading it. BOB hasn't been fixed (to my knowledge, anyway) to read the collections bonus properly. You'll see the same problem with USA 2.1's capital cities and interstate bonuses, for example.
User avatar
Captain -=- Tanarri -=-
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:02 pm
Location: The Underworld
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby EricPhail on Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:53 am

-=- Tanarri -=- wrote:
EricPhail wrote:Okay I'll open the beta feedack with a quick question:

Cities bonus: The legend says +1 per 2 (implying +4 if you hold all of them)

however accoring to BOB: City Bonus (1) 3 City Bonus (2) 4 City Bonus (3) 5 City Bonus (4) 6 City Bonus (5) 7 City Bonus (6)
8 City Bonus (7) (that +1 for every city after the first)

Is BOB misreading this? If not: is the legend misleading, or the bonus coded wrong?


Probably BOB misreading it. BOB hasn't been fixed (to my knowledge, anyway) to read the collections bonus properly. You'll see the same problem with USA 2.1's capital cities and interstate bonuses, for example.


I though BOBs problem with collections was underestimating not overestimating (eg. labyrinth doesn't recognise, multiple minotaur or food bonuses)

This goes the other way (and with each item listed seperately) and thus looks to be a different issue IMO
Sergeant 1st Class EricPhail
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:59 pm
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby -=- Tanarri -=- on Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:01 am

EricPhail wrote:
-=- Tanarri -=- wrote:
EricPhail wrote:Okay I'll open the beta feedack with a quick question:

Cities bonus: The legend says +1 per 2 (implying +4 if you hold all of them)

however accoring to BOB: City Bonus (1) 3 City Bonus (2) 4 City Bonus (3) 5 City Bonus (4) 6 City Bonus (5) 7 City Bonus (6)
8 City Bonus (7) (that +1 for every city after the first)

Is BOB misreading this? If not: is the legend misleading, or the bonus coded wrong?


Probably BOB misreading it. BOB hasn't been fixed (to my knowledge, anyway) to read the collections bonus properly. You'll see the same problem with USA 2.1's capital cities and interstate bonuses, for example.


I though BOBs problem with collections was underestimating not overestimating (eg. labyrinth doesn't recognise, multiple minotaur or food bonuses)

This goes the other way (and with each item listed seperately) and thus looks to be a different issue IMO


That does sound like a different problem then, since the one I'm familiar with is underestimating, rather than over estimating.
User avatar
Captain -=- Tanarri -=-
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:02 pm
Location: The Underworld
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Seamus76 on Wed Jul 31, 2013 11:12 am

EricPhail wrote:Okay I'll open the beta feedack with a quick question:

Cities bonus: The legend says +1 per 2 (implying +4 if you hold all of them)

however accoring to BOB: City Bonus (1) 3 City Bonus (2) 4 City Bonus (3) 5 City Bonus (4) 6 City Bonus (5) 7 City Bonus (6)
8 City Bonus (7) (that +1 for every city after the first)

Is BOB misreading this? If not: is the legend misleading, or the bonus coded wrong?

Ok, I see this too. I had 3 cities and received +2 instead of the +1 it should be, until 4 cities are held, then +2 would be correct.

So, are you all saying it's an XML issue? If so that's fine, we can take a look and see what the problem is. If it's BOB, then I'm not sure what to do, since some people don't use BOB. But based on what you all are saying it doesn't seem like BOB, correct?
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby -=- Tanarri -=- on Wed Jul 31, 2013 3:56 pm

Seamus76 wrote:
EricPhail wrote:Okay I'll open the beta feedack with a quick question:

Cities bonus: The legend says +1 per 2 (implying +4 if you hold all of them)

however accoring to BOB: City Bonus (1) 3 City Bonus (2) 4 City Bonus (3) 5 City Bonus (4) 6 City Bonus (5) 7 City Bonus (6)
8 City Bonus (7) (that +1 for every city after the first)

Is BOB misreading this? If not: is the legend misleading, or the bonus coded wrong?

Ok, I see this too. I had 3 cities and received +2 instead of the +1 it should be, until 4 cities are held, then +2 would be correct.

So, are you all saying it's an XML issue? If so that's fine, we can take a look and see what the problem is. If it's BOB, then I'm not sure what to do, since some people don't use BOB. But based on what you all are saying it doesn't seem like BOB, correct?


Whether it's a BOB or XML issue can easily be determined by what bonus you're actually getting as indicated by the game log. If the log is saying +2 for 3 cities then it's likely an XML issue, if it's saying +1 for 3 cities, then it's likely a BOB issue.
User avatar
Captain -=- Tanarri -=-
 
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:02 pm
Location: The Underworld
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Gilligan on Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:30 pm

Well, for starters, you can get rid of the 3, 5 and 7 city bonus if it's +1 for every 2.

In the XML the 4 City Bonus gives +3...should be +2. 6 says +5 and should be +4, 8 says 7 and should be +6, so the XML is being overshot by 1.
Image
User avatar
Captain Gilligan
 
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Providence, RI
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby EricPhail on Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:35 pm

Gilligan wrote:Well, for starters, you can get rid of the 3, 5 and 7 city bonus if it's +1 for every 2.

In the XML the 4 City Bonus gives +3...should be +2. 6 says +5 and should be +4, 8 says 7 and should be +6, so the XML is being overshot by 1.


Surely 6 should give +3 and 8 give +4 (as I said in my first post on the matter - it's currently +1 for each city after the first, rather than +1 per 2 as it's meant to be)
Sergeant 1st Class EricPhail
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:59 pm
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Gilligan on Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:37 pm

EricPhail wrote:
Gilligan wrote:Well, for starters, you can get rid of the 3, 5 and 7 city bonus if it's +1 for every 2.

In the XML the 4 City Bonus gives +3...should be +2. 6 says +5 and should be +4, 8 says 7 and should be +6, so the XML is being overshot by 1.


Surely 6 should give +3 and 8 give +4 (as I said in my first post on the matter - it's currently +1 for each city after the first, rather than +1 per 2 as it's meant to be)


Right, yeah, sorry. :oops: :oops:
Image
User avatar
Captain Gilligan
 
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Providence, RI
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Seamus76 on Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:04 pm

Gilligan wrote:
EricPhail wrote:
Gilligan wrote:Well, for starters, you can get rid of the 3, 5 and 7 city bonus if it's +1 for every 2.

In the XML the 4 City Bonus gives +3...should be +2. 6 says +5 and should be +4, 8 says 7 and should be +6, so the XML is being overshot by 1.


Surely 6 should give +3 and 8 give +4 (as I said in my first post on the matter - it's currently +1 for each city after the first, rather than +1 per 2 as it's meant to be)


Right, yeah, sorry. :oops: :oops:

:lol: Ok, so is it the XML or what? How do we fix it?
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Gilligan on Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:13 pm

Here you go
Attachments
China.xml
(18.63 KiB) Downloaded 1148 times
Image
User avatar
Captain Gilligan
 
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Providence, RI
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-01] p16

Postby Seamus76 on Wed Jul 31, 2013 8:21 pm

Gilligan wrote:Here you go
Thanks!! I'll get the OP and the Official XML thread updated.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-31] p19 XML Only

Postby eugenesg on Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:15 am

kudos...this map is long overdue! an interesting period of china's history
Private 1st Class eugenesg
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:01 pm
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-31] p19 XML Only

Postby Seamus76 on Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:25 am

eugenesg wrote:kudos...this map is long overdue! an interesting period of china's history
thanks so much, it's pretty fun so far, and I'm glad you like it.

I did notice another xml fix. It looks like Liang North is coded as a city, which it shouldn't be.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-31] p19 XML Only

Postby Leehar on Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:20 am

Did anyone else have an issue with the one-way arrow on tian-shu almost blending with the mountainside?
Although once you know it's there you can distinguish it :/
show
User avatar
Colonel Leehar
 
Posts: 5491
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Location: Johannesburg
Top

Re: Three Kingdoms of China - v9.0 [2013-07-31] p19 XML Only

Postby Seamus76 on Mon Aug 05, 2013 8:40 am

Leehar wrote:Did anyone else have an issue with the one-way arrow on tian-shu almost blending with the mountainside?
Although once you know it's there you can distinguish it :/
I have not had that feedback yet, but obviously if more people have a problem then I will do what I can to fix it.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Seamus76
 
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB