,
Moderator: Cartographers


 natty dread
				natty dread
			












 
		


 RedBaron0
				RedBaron0
			


























 
			the.killing.44 wrote:Sea line connectors
 Now all that jitter and stuff makes perfect sense.
  Now all that jitter and stuff makes perfect sense.   



 RedBaron0
				RedBaron0
			


























 
			MrBenn wrote:Technically it's a "falling sun" (as the lines come down instead of up), but I think we can let it pass...

 ender516
				ender516
			










 
		 
   
 


 RedBaron0
				RedBaron0
			


























 
			RedBaron0 wrote:Might be part of the transfer, I'll likely try a version that's a .png see if that's any better.
RedBaron0 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Sea line connectorsNow all that jitter and stuff makes perfect sense.
EDIT Ignore that last statement.... NOW I get it, and you're so right 44, thanks!
 If you didn't already realize this is the way to go, go crazy with the brush things, like you would make the vector mask only in its own layer with a black brush. Then, select the pixels of the layer, go into the merged layer for all your red things, invert the selection (cmd + I on a Mac with Ps, no clue about PC with GIMP), and delete. You can delete the crazy brush layer.
 If you didn't already realize this is the way to go, go crazy with the brush things, like you would make the vector mask only in its own layer with a black brush. Then, select the pixels of the layer, go into the merged layer for all your red things, invert the selection (cmd + I on a Mac with Ps, no clue about PC with GIMP), and delete. You can delete the crazy brush layer.
 the.killing.44
				the.killing.44
			


















 
			 I think I'll have to try another way anyways.  Function trumps form so the lines need to be clearly connecting each territory and achieve this painted on look.  I think the text has come out better using photoshop too.(I retyped them)  I may have to still think about using an outer glow or drop shadow on the text, very lightly in the spots where the lines cross borders the territory names are getting a bit lost, but not too badly.
  I think I'll have to try another way anyways.  Function trumps form so the lines need to be clearly connecting each territory and achieve this painted on look.  I think the text has come out better using photoshop too.(I retyped them)  I may have to still think about using an outer glow or drop shadow on the text, very lightly in the spots where the lines cross borders the territory names are getting a bit lost, but not too badly.


 RedBaron0
				RedBaron0
			


























 
			 
 drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".

 jefjef
				jefjef
			














 
		RedBaron0 wrote:
I think it worked out pretty well. Still working on the sea connections... I downloaded photoshop for just this, free trail. The paths tool is so much different than GIMP'sI think I'll have to try another way anyways. Function trumps form so the lines need to be clearly connecting each territory and achieve this painted on look. I think the text has come out better using photoshop too.(I retyped them) I may have to still think about using an outer glow or drop shadow on the text, very lightly in the spots where the lines cross borders the territory names are getting a bit lost, but not too badly.

 elfish_lad
				elfish_lad
			






















 
		jefjef wrote:Think your way too light on your title stamp. I've owned Japanese silk paintings that had red stamps on them and they were very crisp. Not faint at all.
elfish_lad wrote:Okay damn it. I know I'm a newt to the map world but... I feel like we are taking a step back here. The versions where we were talking about waves and cool Japanese paper looking maps ROCKED and this one... is great, but looks like every other very good map at CC. Maybe I've missed the general shift here but I don't (personally) think this is a step forward. I loved the modern look of versions before this.
Sorry if I am off track on this and ignore me if I am but Red I LOVED the other version better.
Cheers, and thanks for all your hard work here.
E.

 ender516
				ender516
			










 
		 That's what I was talking about. You should probably up the opacity, or make it a little more covered. It's not supposed to be charred, but inconsistent, if that makes sense.
 That's what I was talking about. You should probably up the opacity, or make it a little more covered. It's not supposed to be charred, but inconsistent, if that makes sense.
 the.killing.44
				the.killing.44
			


















 
			the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.

 ender516
				ender516
			










 
		ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?

 the.killing.44
				the.killing.44
			


















 
			the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?
The font and calligraphy tried to go down the calligraphic ancient path while the rest of the map was in the 21st or 22nd Century.

 ender516
				ender516
			










 
		ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?
The font and calligraphy tried to go down the calligraphic ancient path while the rest of the map was in the 21st or 22nd Century.
The font used for the territories and legend looks about the same to me between old and new, apart from being a little squashed vertically on the new. And, if by the "calligraphy" you mean the kanji text on the regions as a pattern, I don't see what makes it ancient. It's just Japanese to me. Do you know that these are ancient script forms and not modern?

 the.killing.44
				the.killing.44
			


















 
			the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:ender516 wrote:the.killing.44 wrote:Oh, and no offense but the old image looked like someone barfed in the form of Japan, colored over it in bright colors, and tried to make it look ancient.
If they covered the barf in bright colours, it doesn't really matter how the form was made, does it? And how did it look ancient at all?
The font and calligraphy tried to go down the calligraphic ancient path while the rest of the map was in the 21st or 22nd Century.
The font used for the territories and legend looks about the same to me between old and new, apart from being a little squashed vertically on the new. And, if by the "calligraphy" you mean the kanji text on the regions as a pattern, I don't see what makes it ancient. It's just Japanese to me. Do you know that these are ancient script forms and not modern?
No, I meant the Riben, compass, and all the other fonts, as well. Though, now that you remind me that the pattern backgrounds were characters, not just tire treads, I suppose they add to that feel, too.
It's not a matter of what is from ancient times vs. modern times, it's the theme/feeling the aspects are trying to create. You want the map to mesh well via consistency. The old map was anything but consistent in its theme.

 ender516
				ender516
			










 
		



 MrBenn
				MrBenn
			


















 
		 eigenvector
				eigenvector
			









 
		


 RedBaron0
				RedBaron0
			


























 
			 
  eigenvector
				eigenvector
			









 
		 
 drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".

 jefjef
				jefjef
			














 
		
 AndyDufresne
				AndyDufresne
			











 
			


 RedBaron0
				RedBaron0
			


























 
			




 fumandomuerte
				fumandomuerte
			


















 
		


 RedBaron0
				RedBaron0
			


























 
			Users browsing this forum: No registered users