m=0
Moderator: Community Team

 KidBomb
				KidBomb
			

 
		

 e_i_pi
				e_i_pi
			













 
			 Then i realised 1 is the lowest
 Then i realised 1 is the lowest  

 samuelc812
				samuelc812
			




















 
		 FabledIntegral
				FabledIntegral
			






 
			 blakebowling
				blakebowling
			















 
		FabledIntegral wrote:Is it really needeD? I mean it's not calculated into the average, which is all people look at .

 cicero
				cicero
			




 
		 Jeff Hardy
				Jeff Hardy
			







 
		
 lozzini
				lozzini
			










 
		

 The Neon Peon
				The Neon Peon
			












 
		Jeff Hardy wrote:i think this would be a waist of the mods time


 hecter
				hecter
			











 
			 william18
				william18
			











 
		cicero wrote:FabledIntegral wrote:Is it really needeD? I mean it's not calculated into the average, which is all people look at .
Whilst it's not included in the average it might well be a quick and easy fix which would have the benefit e_i_pi highlights ... If it's quick and easy, why not.

 Snorri1234
				Snorri1234
			




 
			
 CafeT
				CafeT
			














 
		 chapcrap
				chapcrap
			






























 
		
 CafeT
				CafeT
			














 
		 chapcrap
				chapcrap
			






























 
		chapcrap wrote:I don't have a good plan. Sorry for that. There is a thread about bringing back feedback. That was the system used before ratings. Some kind of hybrid would probably e the best.
The problem with the rating system is that almost everyone just gives 5s to everyone for eveything no matter what. It's just not really representative of reality.

 zimmah
				zimmah
			



















 
		
 CafeT
				CafeT
			














 
		
 CafeT
				CafeT
			














 
		
 macbone
				macbone
			

























 
			chapcrap wrote:I don't have a good plan. Sorry for that. There is a thread about bringing back feedback. That was the system used before ratings. Some kind of hybrid would probably e the best.
The problem with the rating system is that almost everyone just gives 5s to everyone for eveything no matter what. It's just not really representative of reality.

 Fazeem
				Fazeem
			










 
		
 dshedd
				dshedd
			





















 
		dshedd wrote:Hello,
So, when you give a player a "rating" you can give 1-5 stars. You cannot give a zero star rating. This is totally fine. However, when you look at your ratings, sometimes a person will rate two of the three things (say, "fair play" and "gameplay" but NOT "attitude"). When you look at such a rating it looks like someone gave you "zero" stars for attitude, when they in fact simply did not rate you on that category. People get mad and say: "HEY! WHY DID YOU GIVE ME A BAD RATING??" or something, when really NO rating was given.... it just LOOKS like they gave you zero stars for something. I think, on the ratings page, having a symbol for "not rated" would eliminate confusion. I realize this is trivial, but anything that keeps the bad vibes down in internet games in general is helpful.
Did that make sense? Cool.
Best,
dshedd

 Metsfanmax
				Metsfanmax
			























 
		
 DoomYoshi
				DoomYoshi
			

























 
		DoomYoshi wrote:If you click the star to the left of the 5 you can leave a zero-star rating. It shows up as "No Rating" though, meaning there is no way to distinguish between the 2 options.
Neither of you guys even have platinum, so what are you talkin about?

 Metsfanmax
				Metsfanmax
			























 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users