m=0 Conquer Club • View topic - [GO] Unlimited Adjacent Fortification
Conquer Club

[GO] Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!
Post a reply

Postby killthejoe on Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:51 am

I'd like to know why this was rejected? Is it too difficult to code, or does the site operator simply not like this idea? I personally think this is by far the best way to play.

Think of it as military mobilization. If the US has troops in Northern Iraq, Southern Iraq, and Western Iraq, they can "fortify" each group of armies at the same time into Eastern Iraq.

I used to play this way on a Hasbro board with my friends and believe it to be the most realistic form of play.

Please reconsider this rejection.

Thank you.
"Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves."
-Albert Einstein
User avatar
Corporal killthejoe
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:05 am
Top

Postby cena-rules on Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:56 am

killthejoe wrote:I'd like to know why this was rejected? Is it too difficult to code, or does the site operator simply not like this idea? I personally think this is by far the best way to play.

Think of it as military mobilization. If the US has troops in Northern Iraq, Southern Iraq, and Western Iraq, they can "fortify" each group of armies at the same time into Eastern Iraq.

I used to play this way on a Hasbro board with my friends and believe it to be the most realistic form of play.

Please reconsider this rejection.

Thank you.


it was rejected because it would be too hard to program

see that turtle dude what he says goes
19:41:22 ‹jakewilliams› I was a pedo
User avatar
Lieutenant cena-rules
 
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:27 am
Location: Chat
Top

Postby Genghis Khan CA on Sun Oct 21, 2007 10:01 am

killthejoe wrote:I'd like to know why this was rejected? Is it too difficult to code, or does the site operator simply not like this idea?


lackattack wrote:Too hard to program.


:roll:
Highest score: 562
Highest place: 16590
Highest rank: Private
User avatar
Brigadier Genghis Khan CA
 
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:19 pm
Top

Postby john1099 on Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:03 am

Genghis Khan CA wrote:
killthejoe wrote:I'd like to know why this was rejected? Is it too difficult to code, or does the site operator simply not like this idea?


lackattack wrote:Too hard to program.


:roll:


lol.
GunnaRoolsUDrool wrote:yo mama has 3 titties, ones for milk, ones for water, ones out of order
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class john1099
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 1:14 am
Location: St. Catharines, ON
Top

Postby James Julius on Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:48 am

Without a doubt unlimited adjacent fortification is the best option in terms of realistic strategic simulation. The existing options are weak by comparison. I came to the forum to suggest it myself, as I'm sure others will in the future. Those who oppose the idea of it are lacking in strategic understanding.

What a shame this is too difficult to program.
User avatar
Major James Julius
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:55 am
Location: Lake Erie
Top

Fortifications

Postby Simon Viavant on Sat May 24, 2008 6:12 pm

Concise description:
What if you could fortify only one space, but make more than one fortification?
Basically unlimited adjacent fortifications.

Specifics:
You have 10 armies on Indonesia and 10 on North Africa. You hold Siam, India, Brazil, and Argentina. You can fortify from Indonesia to Siam, but not on to India. You can also fortify from North Africa to Brazil, but not on to Argentina. You can do both of the above mentioned fortifications in one turn.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
It would be more realistic militarily than adjacent, because you can move all of your armies, but only a little ways. It would provide another option for fortifying.
User avatar
Corporal Simon Viavant
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:17 pm
Location: Alaska
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby Thezzaruz on Sat May 24, 2008 6:21 pm

It's a bit tricky though as it would have to be a limit on how far each single army could be fortified for each round (and it would need to keep track of each individual army and its movement).

i.e a army standing on indonesia can be fortified to siam but not from siam to india (in the same turn), however an army standing on siam (before the indonesian troops where fortified) should be able to fortify to india (even after the indonesian troops was fortified). Because if you allow armies to be double fortified then you just have a slow "unlimited" and that would be a crappy idea.
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby Simon Viavant on Sat May 24, 2008 7:13 pm

That would be simple to do, But it still might confuse people. If there are 4 armies on siam and you move 10 from indonesia then you can only move 3 to india. But I can see people hitting fortify over and over again and wondering why it's saying illegal fortification.
User avatar
Corporal Simon Viavant
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:17 pm
Location: Alaska
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby ParadiceCity9 on Sat May 24, 2008 8:37 pm

This is just literally unlimited forts...no point...
Corporal 1st Class ParadiceCity9
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:10 pm
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby Simon Viavant on Sat May 24, 2008 9:32 pm

Did you even read it? Let's try this again. Each army can move one space, and then can't move. So, you have four armies in Brazil and seven in Venezuela. You can fortify three to Venezuela from Brazil, but you can only fortify seven from Venezuela to Central America.
User avatar
Corporal Simon Viavant
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:17 pm
Location: Alaska
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby ParadiceCity9 on Sat May 24, 2008 10:11 pm

Well it would be too complicated regardless. And no i did not read it.
Corporal 1st Class ParadiceCity9
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:10 pm
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby Thezzaruz on Sun May 25, 2008 8:15 am

Simon Viavant wrote:That would be simple to do,


Not at all sure about that...
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby Simon Viavant on Sun May 25, 2008 12:53 pm

I hate it when people take one phrase out of context.
User avatar
Corporal Simon Viavant
 
Posts: 328
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:17 pm
Location: Alaska
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby Thezzaruz on Sun May 25, 2008 6:34 pm

Simon Viavant wrote:I hate it when people take one phrase out of context.


Well as you wrote the post that sentence had a different context than the rest of the post so I don't see what you a complaining about.
User avatar
Lieutenant Thezzaruz
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: OTF most of the time.
Top

Re: Fortifications

Postby blakebowling on Sun May 25, 2008 8:21 pm

This Idea has already been rejected, next time check the Suggestion Box at the top of this forum ;)
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1
Top

Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby Kemmler on Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:23 pm

Concise description:
  • Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Specifics:
  • It is like adjacent but you can make unlimited fortifications to adjacent teritories.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • nice new fortifying option
User avatar
Cook Kemmler
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: GOODBYE CC
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby Stroop on Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:27 pm

Has been rejected in the past
Image
User avatar
Major Stroop
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:01 am
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby pancakemix on Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:28 pm

Then I could just fortify through all my territories until I get them where I want them. All this is is Unlimited that's annoying and takes forever.
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class pancakemix
 
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: The Grim Guzzler
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby Stroop on Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:30 pm

The general idea is that you can't do that. Every army could individually make 1 adjacent fortification move.

For example, you have 3 on A, 4 on B and 1 on C. You could fort 2 from A to B, but then only 3 from B to C, as two of them had moved from A and used up their fortification move.

It's already been rejected though, so really no point in discussing it
Image
User avatar
Major Stroop
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:01 am
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby blakebowling on Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:36 pm

Stroop wrote:The general idea is that you can't do that. Every army could individually make 1 adjacent fortification move.

For example, you have 3 on A, 4 on B and 1 on C. You could fort 2 from A to B, but then only 3 from B to C, as two of them had moved from A and used up their fortification move.

It's already been rejected though, so really no point in discussing it

right, it's too much work coding that in
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby Skittles! on Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:41 am

And you can just do it anyway..
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby Kemmler on Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:58 am

Stroop wrote:The general idea is that you can't do that. Every army could individually make 1 adjacent fortification move.

For example, you have 3 on A, 4 on B and 1 on C. You could fort 2 from A to B, but then only 3 from B to C, as two of them had moved from A and used up their fortification move.

It's already been rejected though, so really no point in discussing it


no I had the move any army you want in mind
User avatar
Cook Kemmler
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: GOODBYE CC
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby Stroop on Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:00 pm

Kemmler wrote:
Stroop wrote:The general idea is that you can't do that. Every army could individually make 1 adjacent fortification move.

For example, you have 3 on A, 4 on B and 1 on C. You could fort 2 from A to B, but then only 3 from B to C, as two of them had moved from A and used up their fortification move.

It's already been rejected though, so really no point in discussing it


no I had the move any army you want in mind


oh, you mean Unlimited? I think we have that
Image
User avatar
Major Stroop
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:01 am
Top

Re: Unlimited Adjacent Fortification

Postby cicero on Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:39 am

Merged with existing thread:
Unlimited Adjacent Fortification - posts 4 to 10 December 2006 - first post here
User avatar
Sergeant cicero
 
Posts: 1358
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: with the infected neutrals ... handing out maps to help them find their way to CC
Top

Adjacent forts

Postby gundiesalvo on Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:56 pm

Concise description:
  • To make another form of adjacent fortifications, or substitute the current one with REAL adjacent fortifications, meaning one could make an unlimited amount of fortifications as long as the units he's moving only move one territory away (or two for horses in Waterloo and similar territory types)

Specifics:
  • Whenever I play risk with adjacent forts (Real board game), what this rule implies is you can move ANY units in the map, but only one territory. So if you had South America, and your borders were on Mexico and North Africa, and let's say you traded in a set that had Brazil and Venezuela and you get 2 on each, you want to reinforce Venezuela to Mexico and Brazil to North Africa, then that you can do, it's two adjacent reinforcements, however, if someone decides to attack your North Africa border and weakens it, you CAN'T reinforce it with units from Mexico, they'd have to go to Venezuela the first round, to Brazil the following, and then to NA if it's still yours...

This will improve the following aspects of the site:
  • Make the adjacent forts setting a bit more dynamic.
  • Give players more possibilities for different strategies.
Corporal gundiesalvo
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Mexico City
Top
PreviousNext
Post a reply

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Powered by phpBB