,
Moderator: Cartographers


 wcaclimbing
				wcaclimbing
			














 
			wcaclimbing wrote:maybe I'm just confused, but:
In the Rules of Engagement, the last entry.
It says "the river is uncrossable along borders except at the Karkh-Greenzone Bridge"
Shouldn't it be the "Rusafa-Greenzone Bridge"? because those are the two places connected by the bridge......


 yeti_c
				yeti_c
			













 
		 hunnybunny
				hunnybunny
			






 
		 hunnybunny
				hunnybunny
			






 
		hunnybunny wrote:I see you have Jaysh al Mahdi (JAM) in there...have you considered somehow incorporating Peshmerga, JAM Special Groups, IRGC Quds Force? I love the idea of this map, it's very interesting. Don't worry about people who say this is an inappropriate map. I'm getting deployed to Iraq and I have no problem with it.
Although I think the map at this point might be a bit too complex. It looks like it will have a very large learning curve which means less people will play it. For bonuses, I think you should focus more on Iraqi Kurdistan, the Shia south, Sunni central, and various hotspots that are their own bonuses (Kirkuk, Baghdad, Mosul, etc.)

 mibi
				mibi
			




 
			 hunnybunny
				hunnybunny
			






 
		
 TaCktiX
				TaCktiX
			















 
		mibi wrote:hopefully this map will be in play before the war ends, but you never know around here.

 edbeard
				edbeard
			







 
		

 yeti_c
				yeti_c
			













 
		yeti_c wrote:Mibi - I think you need to provide links to the latest images... especially the latest small map - as I've not seen that anywhere since your last changes!?
C.

 mibi
				mibi
			




 
			
 mibi
				mibi
			




 
			TaCktiX wrote:Small nitpick: the shadow near the Baghdad bonuses (Mahdi area, Baathist region) almost completely obscures the color of the Baathist region. I'm still able to infer based on the text color, but the circle itself is too dark.
hunnybunny wrote:I understand that you can't always change the game based on an everchanging landscape...but I do have one question: what time period are you hoping to convey? 2003? 2007?
Personally, I think you should just ditch the Baathists since there not really in play anymore (almost all of them that are left are now in Syria). In place of the Baathists just put Sunnis or if you want to be more specific Tawafuq or Sons of Iraq...I say you use Sunni since most people understand what a Sunni is.

 mibi
				mibi
			




 
			yeti_c wrote:Quench

 t-o-m
				t-o-m
			



















 
		yeti_c wrote:Quench
C.

 Incandenza
				Incandenza
			














 
		Incandenza wrote:yeti_c wrote:Quench
C.
QFMFT.


 yeti_c
				yeti_c
			













 
		

 Incandenza
				Incandenza
			














 
		
 Incandenza
				Incandenza
			














 
		
 AndyDufresne
				AndyDufresne
			











 
			Incandenza wrote:mibi, you should start a new poll:
Will this map get quenched before the US military leaves Iraq?
Yes
No
GFY


 oaktown
				oaktown
			









 
		
 Incandenza
				Incandenza
			














 
		AndyDufresne wrote:Forza just needs to do a check on this I believe.
--Andy

 Forza AZ
				Forza AZ
			

















 
		

 yeti_c
				yeti_c
			













 
		yeti_c wrote:OK - I have fixed that to have just 2 territories required...
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/1/19/ ... _fixed.xml
C.

 Forza AZ
				Forza AZ
			

















 
		Forza AZ wrote:yeti_c wrote:OK - I have fixed that to have just 2 territories required...
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/1/19/ ... _fixed.xml
C.
I checked the fix. Didn't check the rest again, as I assume you didn't make any other changes then the al-Qaeda fix.
So the XML should be correct now.


 yeti_c
				yeti_c
			













 
		Users browsing this forum: No registered users