BeNeLux [Quenched]

by **Gilligan** on Wed May 09, 2007 7:03 pm

bump...

by **AndyDufresne** on Wed May 09, 2007 7:17 pm

No point in bumping until MarVal gets the XML and such all ready.

--Andy

by **MarVal** on Sun May 13, 2007 1:19 pm

Gilligan wrote:bump...

Is that all you can say?
No respons on the updates, no suggestions, no nothing.... only bump....

And Andy, thanks that you have faith in me. I'm just busy, but the XML will come. No excuses.

Grtz
MarVal

by **Gilligan** on Mon May 14, 2007 5:49 am

MarVal wrote:
Gilligan wrote:bump...

Is that all you can say?
No respons on the updates, no suggestions, no nothing.... only bump....

And Andy, thanks that you have faith in me. I'm just busy, but the XML will come. No excuses.

Grtz
MarVal

Actually, yeah. There is nothing wrong with this map, only but the XML is not finished.

by **Lanceyboyuk** on Tue May 22, 2007 8:32 am

XML finished?

by **MarVal** on Tue May 22, 2007 2:40 pm

Below the latest development of the map BeNeLux.

UPDATE 30 (with XML)
Larger map :
(600x550)

Some suggestions that were mentioned:

- New mountains, no 3D feel, more 2D and flat.
- The Letzebuerg name is more centered underneath its country.
- Capitals Legend is bold
- The text "Control of..." is bold.
- The text "non-crossing..." is bold.
- Signature less blurry.
- I'm working on the XML small.

So let us know what U think of the new armyshadows on the map BeNeLux so far.

Grtz
MarVal
member of De Veroveraars Club

by **Wisse** on Tue May 22, 2007 2:47 pm

you tried shadows after your armys shades? or make them pure white and than make them transparant? or with a border around the circle?

by **MarVal** on Tue May 22, 2007 2:50 pm

Wisse wrote:you tried shadows after your armys shades? or make them pure white and than make them transparant? or with a border around the circle?

They're just the same as in previous updates.
And so they're not obviously in the picture.

Grtz
MarVal

by **Wisse** on Tue May 22, 2007 3:13 pm

MarVal wrote:
Wisse wrote:you tried shadows after your armys shades? or make them pure white and than make them transparant? or with a border around the circle?

They're just the same as in previous updates.
And so they're not obviously in the picture.

Grtz
MarVal

i know but did you try if that did look better?

by **KEYOGI** on Tue May 22, 2007 4:55 pm

I see quite a few coordinates that look a little out. Just with a quick look I can see:

Utrecht
Veluwe
Betuwe
Markizaat

by **DiM** on Tue May 22, 2007 5:19 pm

also shengen and neufchateau but there are several more.

marval, could you please post an image with 88 army numbers??

here are some more suggestions:
1. move ostkantone label a bit closer and remove the black line
2. move the zeeuws-vlaanderen army number onto the sea just like the other 3 numbers.
3. why does the monarchy border move outside into the neutral terit? caould you make it end where the playable terits end?

the map looks great. it has a nice clean look.

PS: you know what's funny? this map has the best designed non playable terit. i don't know why but it looks absolutely stunning.

by **MarVal** on Wed May 23, 2007 1:10 pm

Wisse wrote:
MarVal wrote:
Wisse wrote:you tried shadows after your armys shades? or make them pure white and than make them transparant? or with a border around the circle?

They're just the same as in previous updates.
And so they're not obviously in the picture.

Grtz
MarVal

i know but did you try if that did look better?

Yes, but then the map seems too look crowdy. See also some earlier updates.

Grtz
MarVal

by **MarVal** on Wed May 23, 2007 1:26 pm

DiM wrote:marval, could you please post an image with 88 army numbers??

here are some more suggestions:
1. move ostkantone label a bit closer and remove the black line
2. move the zeeuws-vlaanderen army number onto the sea just like the other 3 numbers.
3. why does the monarchy border move outside into the neutral terit? caould you make it end where the playable terits end?

the map looks great. it has a nice clean look.

PS: you know what's funny? this map has the best designed non playable terit. i don't know why but it looks absolutely stunning.

- Yes, I will do that in the next update (with 88 army numbers).
- 1. It can't, otherwise the text will come to close to the coat of arms of Belgium.
- 2. If I do that then men can't see were those armycircle belong. Because the end of that country is too small. Or do you have another idea how it works?
- 3. Its a little bit out the borders, so you can see that there are 3 seperate countries
- Thanks, that in you think the map looks great and has a nice clean look.
- I do not know, if I must see it as a compliment or....?

Thanks for your suggestions ans till next update.

Grtz
MarVal

by **MarVal** on Wed May 23, 2007 1:26 pm

KEYOGI wrote:I see quite a few coordinates that look a little out. Just with a quick look I can see:
Utrecht
Veluwe
Betuwe
Markizaat

I shall do it.

Grtz
MarVal

by **DiM** on Wed May 23, 2007 3:08 pm

MarVal wrote:
DiM wrote:marval, could you please post an image with 88 army numbers??

here are some more suggestions:
1. move ostkantone label a bit closer and remove the black line
2. move the zeeuws-vlaanderen army number onto the sea just like the other 3 numbers.
3. why does the monarchy border move outside into the neutral terit? caould you make it end where the playable terits end?

the map looks great. it has a nice clean look.

PS: you know what's funny? this map has the best designed non playable terit. i don't know why but it looks absolutely stunning.

- Yes, I will do that in the next update (with 88 army numbers).
- 1. It can't, otherwise the text will come to close to the coat of arms of Belgium.
- 2. If I do that then men can't see were those armycircle belong. Because the end of that country is too small. Or do you have another idea how it works?
- 3. Its a little bit out the borders, so you can see that there are 3 seperate countries
- Thanks, that in you think the map looks great and has a nice clean look.
- I do not know, if I must see it as a compliment or....?

Thanks for your suggestions ans till next update.

Grtz
MarVal

1. you can move the coat of arms a little bit.
2. fair enough
3. ok i understand. it's good

and yes that's a compliment in most maps people tend to neglect the non playable area and thus it looks worse than the playable part.

by **onbekende** on Fri May 25, 2007 5:43 pm

MarVal wrote:

Army shades and army's that don't allign, 2 possibilitys t fix: move army, move shade. Between () will the offset be

Noord-Nederland:
Drenthe (left)
Frieland (down)

West-Nederland:
Utrecht (right)
Goeree-Overflakkee (right)
Schouwen-Duiveland (right)

Oost-Nederland:
Veluwe (left)

Zuid-Nederland:
Betuwe (right)
Markizaat (right)
Maaskant (left)
Limburg (left)

Vlaanderen:
Belg. Limburg (left)

Belgisch Brabant:
Vlaams (left)

La Wallonie:
Hainaut (right)
Thuin (left)
Namur (right-bottom)
Dinant (left)
Neufchateau (left-bottom)

Luxembourg:
Schengen (right)

Very nice map Marval

by **BulaMatari** on Fri May 25, 2007 5:57 pm

OK Marval our map has finished, so now its up to CC

by **MarVal** on Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:24 pm

Below the latest development of the map BeNeLux.

UPDATE 31 (with XML)
Larger map :
(600x550)

Some suggestions that were mentioned:

- XML with armynumers of 88.
- I'm working on the XML small.

So let us know what U think of the armyshadows with numbers on the map BeNeLux so far.

Grtz
MarVal
member of De Veroveraars Club

by **Gilligan** on Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:28 pm

BulaMatari wrote:OK Marval our map has finished, so now its up to CC

He's got the small XML to do :wink:

by **MarVal** on Sun Jun 03, 2007 5:10 pm

Below the latest development of the map BeNeLux.

UPDATE 32 (Small & Large with XML)

Larger map :
(600x550)

Smaller map :
(550x504)

Some suggestions that were mentioned:

- XML on small map with armynumers of 88.
- XML on large map with armynumbers of 88.

So let us know what U think of the armyshadows with numbers on the map BeNeLux so far.

Grtz
MarVal
member of De Veroveraars Club

by **Gilligan** on Sun Jun 03, 2007 5:12 pm

I think it's good to go.

by **Eyelidman** on Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:03 pm

Do belg limburg and wallon border each other? You should make that clear.

by **KEYOGI** on Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:35 pm

Well spotted Eyelidman, 4-way borders are an unnecessary area of confusion.

by **MarVal** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 10:51 am

Eyelidman wrote:Do belg limburg and wallon border each other? You should make that clear.

Yes, you have a sniper-eye....

I will change it tonight.
And by the way, they do not have borders between them. But off course I will change it. Thanks for your suggestion.

Grtz
MarVal

by **MarVal** on Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:52 pm

Below the latest development of the map BeNeLux.

UPDATE 33 XML (small & large)

Larger map :
(600x550)

Smaller map :
(550x504)

Some suggestions that were mentioned:

- New border between Vlaams, Wallon, Belg. Limburg and Liège.
- Restyle image mountain.
- Text "OstKantone" near its country (no line between the country and the text).
- Coat of arms of Belgium a little bit downwards.

So let us know what U think of the armyshadows with numbers on the map BeNeLux so far.

Grtz
MarVal
member of De Veroveraars Club

BeNeLux [Quenched]

UPDATE 30 (with XML)

Re: UPDATE 30 (with XML)

UPDATE 32 (Small & Large with XML)

UPDATE 33 XML (small & large)

Who is online