,
Moderator: Cartographers





















			oaktown wrote:In addition to bringing down the color, what if the land beveled off at the river's edges, just as it does at the shoreline?
reverend_kyle wrote:I was just trying to figure out a way to resolve the Blue/Grey with the sepia feel and I realized...
Why not do both. I noticed your greys are mostly the same, but the blue colors have changed. Is there a way you could bring back the old colors with a sepia tint to it.













		













		









			












		oaktown wrote:Tisha wrote:i like the white territory names.. easy to read
I agree... it keeps the map clean.













		





		










		













		







		Elijah S wrote:-Vicksburg has replaced Memphis as one of the south's key cities.







		











			














		Unit_2 wrote:i see around the name "Louisiana" there is bright blue its really sticking out to me.
though for the maps i like A better but you need to add the flags and stuff like you did to B without the blue/grey.
also i like the blue better in the B map, how about you try to change the blue in A to that color(the Sherman area blue).













		AndyDufresne wrote:Indeed it has, Reverend Kyle! Some of my favorite maps are those that truly develop and evolve...and this map certainly fits that case!
I voted for the blue/gray...it seems to reflect a mood the map should have.
It's looking good Elijah!
--Andy













		











			






		Lord Zod wrote:I think you should get rid of the cities as some of the ones chosen were not that major during the civil war plus you would be getting a bonus simply for having a territory which some would have with the drop. Also the capitals should be separate territories if the are going to have a bonus.
This map does look interesting though and I hope you can work it out soon.












		Users browsing this forum: No registered users